Looking at the stats on Canadian homicides for 2007

Statistics Canada has released its 2007 report on homicide in Canada and there are some interesting figures therein.

Homicides have decreased from 2006 in total, albeit marginally, at 594, down by 12.

Stabbings account for one third of the 2007 homicides and firearms for another third. This has been the trend, according to Stats Canada, for the past 20 years.

For all of the political rhetoric we hear about violent crime in Canada the homicide rate has been declining since the mid-70s and continued that decline in 2007.

For firearms owners the one statistic of concern is that while overall firearm-related homicides have been decreasing over the past 30-odd years, the portion committed with handguns has been rising. Again, according to the Stats Canada report, twenty years ago they accounted for one-quarter of firearm homicides. In 2007 that figure had risen to two-thirds. This will play right into the hands of politicians such as Toronto Mayor David Miller whose shtick has been to demonize legitimate handgun owners every time Toronto sees another gang killing.

But there are two further pieces of information in the report that put a different spin on those figures.

One is that 81% of handgun related homicides are committed in Canada’s bigger cities. Tied directly to that statistic is that gang-related homicides are a major contributor.

Gang related homicides in Canada have been increasing since 1991 when Stats Canada first began to collect this data. More startling is that they now account for one in every five homicides reported to police and (not surprisingly) that two-thirds of those were committed with a firearm. That compares to 20% of the homicides not involving gangs.

Although there was a drop in the number of youth involved in homicides, about one-third of those were also gang-related. That figure is for the number who were accused and not the number who may have actually murdered someone. You have to get caught to be accused.

It would seem obvious that the high homicide rates recorded in the larger cities have a direct correlation to gang activity.

The city of Toronto overall had the most homicides (111), which was to be expected given its population numbers, of which 54 were committed with a firearm and of those, 23 were considered to be gang-related.

In other cities the effect of gangs on homicide statistics was even more apparent.

Winnipeg: Firearm related homicides – 5. Gang-related homicides – 5.

Edmonton: Firearm related homicides – 13. Gang-related homicides – 16.

Hamilton: Firearm related homicides – 2. Gang-related homicides – 3.

Calgary: Firearm related homicides – 7. Gang-related homicides – 4.

Vancouver: Firearm related homicides – 24. Gang-related homicides – 19.

Montreal: Firearm related homicides – 22. Gang-related homicides – 20.

Does anyone really think that you could stop these gang killing by banning anything?

Regardless, the fact is that homicides in Canada are decreasing; firearm-related homicides as well. That there are now more homicides committed with handguns than with long guns is irrelevant. If by waving a magic wand you could make all the handguns in the country disappear the gangs would switch to long guns and if the long guns disappeared they would bomb each other and if necessary club each other to death.

It’s like the argument the anti-gunners make about gun-related suicides being down since the gun control laws came into effect, as though that is a major victory even though overall suicide rates haven’t gone down. In their fanatical little minds they somehow find it more comforting that the same number of people are dying because they’re killing themselves by some method other than a firearm.

Pretty hard to have a conversation with that mindset.


Tags: , ,

3 Responses to “Looking at the stats on Canadian homicides for 2007”

  1. bluntobject Says:

    Seems as though they’re already bombing each other:


    Not that this’d put a dent in the anti-gunners’ enthusiasm, of course, for the reasons you mention.

  2. zeister Says:

    Statistics Canada states that for 2006, handguns accounted for 1.5% of ALL victims of violence. If you take the Toronto Police Service estimate that perhaps 10% of criminal handguns are stolen from registered owners, we are left with a true figure of 0.16% for handgun violence in Toronto involving registered handguns! The mayor of Toronto’s much vaunted national handgun ban will address 0.16% of ALL violent crime. The Mayor of Vancouver claims the stolen registered handgun figure is about 3% or less than 1/3 of the figure claimed for Toronto.
    For this reality we see Mayor Miller and the Liberal Party led left calling for a ban of all legally registered handguns. They are attacking a law abiding minority group that share a heritage of firearms ownership on the flimsiest possible pretext. Truly, their quest is for votes and not increased public safety.
    Licensing that requires police checks and standardised training coupled with gun storage standards does contribute to public safety. A scandalously expensive long gun registry that does not contribute to increased public safety has no place in a free democratic society. Politicians that promote such a system have an agenda in mind other than public safety.

  3. commonsense Says:

    It’s not about reducing crime.

    Any excuse will do, no matter how contrived.

    It’s about disarming the public and making them afraid.

    The more afraid the public becomes, the more eagerly they will embrace the police state.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: