U.S. gun owners betrayed by a Republican administration?

U.S. gun owners are incensed by the Department of Justice’s “friend of the court” brief in DC versus Heller which is currently before the US Supreme Court.

An article in the Washington Times takes the administration severely to task for their input into this case.

Here’s the rub: The Justice Department says the Court of Appeals ruling that overturned the D.C. ban might cast doubt on the constitutionality of existing federal legislation, including machine-gun regulations. So the administration urged that Heller be returned to the lower courts for appropriate fact-finding to determine whether rifles and shotguns in the home, as permitted by the D.C. Code, are an adequate substitute for handguns.

That came as quite a shock to those of us who believed the administration’s professed fealty to gunowners’ rights. What we got instead was a recommendation that could be the death knell for the only Second Amendment case to reach the Supreme Court in nearly 70 years.
Rather than a foursquare pronouncement that the D.C. handgun ban is unreasonable by any standard, the Justice Department has essentially endorsed years of depositions and expert testimony, and a rerun before a less hospitable Supreme Court.

In effect, a conservative administration has thrown a lifeline to gun controllers. Following the DOJ blueprint, they can pay lip service to an individual right while simultaneously stripping it of any real meaning. After all, if the D.C. ban can survive judicial scrutiny, it is difficult to imagine a regulation that would not.

It looks to me like a case of the bureaucracy advancing its own agenda and in the process further damaging the credibility of the Bush administration in the eyes of a constituency that were strongly supportive in his election run. To rub salt into the wounds, the Department of Justice has come down solidly on the same side of the issue as the notoriously anti-gun Brady Campaign Against Gun Violence.

Did the President and his advisors know of the DOJ’s intent in advance and were either in agreement or simply indifferent to what they were proposing? Or were the DOJ lawyers just so arrogant that they believed they could proceed with their amicus brief completely disengaged from the real world? But that begs the question: Once the cries of outrage and betrayal began why the Cone of Silence over the White House on the issue?

Then in a move that almost bordered on schizophrenia, Vice President Dick Cheney, as president of the U.S. Senate along with 55 members of the U.S. Senate and 250 members of the U.S. House of Representatives signed an Amicus Curiae Brief in support of the respondent, Heller.

John Lott notes that President Bush has the power to order the Solicitor General’s brief to be withdrawn or amended. For whatever reason, this has not happened. Predictably, this has lead US gun owners to believe that their President has sold them out.

Advertisements

Tags:

2 Responses to “U.S. gun owners betrayed by a Republican administration?”

  1. John Lott Says:

    I don’t think that I would use the word “schizophrenia” here. Vice President Dick Cheney has been a stalwart on this issue for as long as he has been in public life. It is interesting that this is the first time in US history that a vice president has signed such a brief, and he did it because he felt so strongly about the issue.

  2. totalrecoil Says:

    John: Thanks for the comment. I have been curious about the Vice President signing on to the Brief and whether it was driven by his personal beliefs or whether it could be interpreted as a statement from the White House. I am pleased to hear you say that it is the former as I have always been a fan of Cheney and it is encouraging to see that he stands by his personal principles.
    Regardless, it is unfortunate that there has been no reaction from President Bush on this issue.
    While political commentators keeps saying that the Republicans need to engage their supporters for the upcoming election this action by the DOJ does exactly the opposite.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: