Is Elizabeth May losing it?

When Elizabeth May became leader of the Green Party she had instant credibility, at least with the media. Then she made the announcement that in the next federal election (whenever that may be) she would run against Conservative cabinet minister Peter McKay in Nova Scotia instead of a safer riding which would give her a chance at being the first member of the Green Party to be elected federally, making electoral history in Canada.

That was questionable, but not as controversial as her next decision which was to make a deal with Liberal leader Stephane Dion, where the Liberals would not run a candidate against her and the Green Party would reciprocate by not running a candidate in Dion’s riding. This friendly partnership with the Liberals raised a lot of concerns in the media and also among Liberal and Green Party supporters as well.

Then this.

On Sunday, Elizabeth May, the leader of the Green Party of Canada, returned to London, Ont., where she lost a byelection five months ago. Although Ms. May was not on the campaign trail this time, she was preaching the Greens’ environmental catechism, this time from the pulpit of a local United Church.


Ms. May’s teary-eyed homily on global warming no doubt moved many in the audience. Speaking of global warming, she told the United Church congregation that “Through the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, we can meet this moral obligation.”

But other parts of her speech were entirely bizarre, conjuring up theories that call into question not only her credibility as the leader of the Greens, but Mr. Dion’s judgment.

In referring to Evangelical Christians, Ms. May stated that some “are waiting for the end [of] time in glee … and they unfortunately include President [George W.] Bush.” Ms. May also described Stephen Harper’s plan to deal with global warming as “worse than Neville Chamberlain’s appeasement of the Nazis.”

One can only wonder what comes next.


2 Responses to “Is Elizabeth May losing it?”

  1. saskboy Says:

    One of the most interesting leaders debates on TV for some years came next.

  2. bluegreenblogger Says:

    I agree with the post, all fair comment. As far as the quote from her sermon from the pulpit, the comparison with Chamberlain is not so far fetched. Chamberlain didn’t deem Hitler a threat, despite a lot of evidence to the contrary and the CPC likewise doesn’t deem greenhouse gases a threat. An apt analogy.
    In what respect is the evangelical movements anticipation of ‘The rapture’ bizarre? I find it bizarre that anybody could be ignorant of this school of thought, and it’s influence on US foreign policy. It is a demonstrable fact that many evangelicals are putting time effort, and money into creating the conditions for the second coming. What is bizarre is that ‘normal’ people will vote these people into positions where they can deploy the resources of the state to achieve this objective.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: